Skip to main content

New top story from Time: When and How You Can Test Yourself for COVID-19 At Home

https://ift.tt/3sZ7a98

When history looks back on the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020 will likely emerge as the year of testing, while 2021 (and likely 2022) will be the year of vaccinations. But that doesn’t mean testing no longer matters.

In fact, testing will become more critical than ever as schools, gyms, workplaces, restaurants and shops reopen, and sports events and concerts rev up again. Given that reality, the recent availability of at-home, DIY tests is welcome news. As of last week, Abbott’s BinaxNOW COVID-19 test—which doctors and hospitals have already been using to screen people—started to become available at retail stores without a prescription.

That’s just in time for the exodus from lockdown and social isolation expected this summer. As people start mingling again, they will need access to more convenient, rapid testing that can provide immediate answers—did my child get infected after playing in the soccer game? Is it safe to have a family dinner with relatives who don’t live with you? Did I get infected after going back to work?

The gold standard testing for SARS-CoV-2, called molecular, or PCR, testing, requires people to go to a health care professional, who swabs a sample from deep in the back of the nose and throat, and then sends the sample to a lab that performs the test. Results take at least a day. But such testing isn’t always necessary. In the coming months, being able to test yourself not once, but as often as you need to, to ensure you haven’t been infected from your activities, will become the priority.

The reason for that has to do with the changing landscape of the pandemic. Last year, when infections were spreading like a fire blazing out of control, testing was essential for identifying people who were positive so they could isolate and get the proper care. In most cases, doctors focused testing on people who had symptoms of COVID-19 like coughs, fever, chills and difficulty breathing. If you weren’t feeling sick, there wasn’t a reason to get tested, especially at the beginning of the pandemic when the tests were scarce and took a week or more to produce results,

As more people get vaccinated, however, theoretically, fewer people will be infected and even fewer will have symptoms. Instead of an inferno, the infections will be more like embers, scattered in communities here and there, and harder to find.

That’s where home, or DIY testing like Abbott’s kit, come in. These are tests that people can buy at their local pharmacy without a prescription, perform on their own without any medical help, and get results in about 15 minutes.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has now authorized four such at-home over-the-counter COVID-19 tests: two from Abbott (the BinaxNow, as well as the BinaxNow Ag Card, which allows people to collect the sample and perform the test while connected to a telehealth provider (an option for those who want the guidance of a professional), and one each from Quidel and Ellume. People swab their noses—not the back of the nose and throat that the other test requires—and place the sample in a specially treated card or tube that provides results, similar to the results of a pregnancy test, in 15 minutes. They are all antigen-based tests, which means that they pick up proteins made by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and not the virus itself. But the level of viral proteins is a proxy for how active, and therefore infectious, the virus is. SARS-CoV-2 is busiest in the first week or so after infecting a new host, pumping out more and more copies of itself. That’s when people are most at danger of passing the virus on to others, through coughs, sneezes or other close contact, even if they don’t feel any symptoms. And those are the exact people these antigen tests are designed to find.

How at-home antigen tests can slow the pandemic

“These tests aren’t just to tell you if you are sick,” says Dr. Michael Mina, assistant professor of epidemiology at Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health. “These tests are society’s way of being able to see the enemy around us, and in this case the enemy happens to be a virus. If you can’t see it, then you don’t know what precautions to take.”

Because they don’t require a prescription, and anyone can take the tests, Mina says their availability should vastly increase access to testing which should in turn help limit the spread of the virus. Parents worried about whether their child’s cough and fever is due to a cold or COVID-19 can use the test at home, for example, and if it’s positive, get in touch with a pediatrician—all without having to bring their sick child into the doctor’s office and potentially infect more people.

People attending small gatherings, or taking a trip, can test themselves beforehand and afterward, so they can be reassured that they haven’t been infected. And schools can rely on the tests to screen for and isolate any positive students or staff, and trace any potentially exposed contacts as quickly as possible.

Ideally, such democratized testing should have been the foundation for the COVID-19 response from the start, says Mina. Instead, since the first test for SARS-CoV-2, from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC), was slow to roll out after problems arose with its accuracy, and regulatory agencies like the FDA were initially hesitant to allow commercial and academic tests on the market, health officials have been blindfolded in trying to fight the virus. “In lieu of testing extensively, the whole pandemic, we treated everyone like they were positive,” says Mina, “and we had to shut the whole of society down because we’ve been blind.”

The at-home tests could finally give us the eyes that we’ve needed into the virus’ comings and goings—and help to avoid another blanket shutdown. In Maryland, the health department is piloting programs to use at-home rapid testing to identify cases among high-risk populations such as home care health workers and people with disabilities. “We’re trying to target folks who can’t afford to get tested but can benefit from having them,” says Jonathan Weinstein, director of COVID-19 testing passports for the department. Weinstein also sees the self-tests as a way to expand the reach of testing by making them available at places like schools, festivals and baseball stadiums.

How public health officials can make at-home testing even more useful

One barrier to widespread use of the self tests, however, is concern about their accuracy, since health professionals won’t be involved in collecting the samples or interpreting the results. That’s the reason that some experts don’t see them as powerful public health tools, although they might be useful for individual people making personal decisions. “There are lots of conundrums for public health that we are trying to work through,” says Kris Ehresmann, director of infectious disease epidemiology, prevention and control at the Minnesota department of health. “I don’t want to suggest that they have no utility. Just that from a public health system and data collection perspective, and how we do our broader recommendations, I think there are enough gaps in validation and quality of the results that we have to really be careful.”

She notes that self-tests are a good starting point to identify possible new cases, but that using them to take broader action is still problematic. If, for example, a student on a school soccer team tests positive using an at-home self-test, is that enough to quarantine the rest of the team, who might have been exposed to that player, and pull the entire team from upcoming games? To make those kinds of decisions, she says, “You want to make sure you are feeling really confident about the sensitivity and specificity of the test. I think there will be a lot of learning in the next months and years until we ultimately get to a place where we can speak more confidently about the role and place these tests will have.”

Those decisions will also depend on the balance between the test’s sensitivity in detecting infections, and its convenience and accessibility. A CDC study of Abbott’s tests (both use the same chemistry) conducted at community health centers in November and December of 2020, and compared it to the results of PCR tests. They found that the Abbott test picked up 64% of cases among people with symptoms, but only 35% among those who did not. Because symptoms usually occur within days of infection, however, Abbott says its test is useful for identifying people who are most infectious, and therefore could be helpful in identifying infected people early and ultimately controlling spread of disease.

Mina points out that the use case for at-home testing is different than that of molecular, or PCR testing. At-home testing, he says, is better suited to screening a population for infections, where the more involved PCR test isn’t always necessary or practical. And for much of the beginning of the pandemic, the FDA only allowed PCR testing even if it meant people waited as long as 10 days for the results. That strategy slowed the availability of at home testing in the U.S.; they are only now becoming widely available just over a year after the first case was confirmed, when they could have been useful all along in giving public health officials a better sense of where cases were before they became clusters. “We want everything to be totally controlled and totally perfect even if it is at the expense of testing failing,” he says. “We would rather not have any test than an imperfect test, which doesn’t make sense.”

The goal of testing is also changing, from one that is entirely focused on public health needs to one that is increasingly personal and individual. “If you are asking if you can go see grandma right now, you’re asking if you are infectious right now. And that’s what the quick at-home tests allow,” says Mina. “What the super-high-sensitivity PCR tests are doing is effectively finding if someone was infectious two or three weeks ago, and that’s not the information you really want about whether it’s safe to visit your grandma right now.”

“Public health is all about dealing with messy data,” he adds, about the potential that some results may not be as accurate as PCR testing. “We can look for signals in the noise.” One way to do that is to repeat the antigen at-home tests to have more confidence in the result. Indeed, Abbott’s BinaxNOW kit comes with two tests so users can do just that. Mina does acknowledge, however, that the at-home tests could become more useful for public health purposes if they include a way for people to easily report the results to their local health authorities so the data can be collected in a more systematic way. “We should be linking the tests to simple one-click reporting that should be anonymous and only geolocates by your zip code,” he says. “If we have more testing, then even if a small fraction of people are reporting, then ultimately that would provide more public health data, not less. Not having that reporting option is a big mistake.”

Given that the FDA appears to be leaning toward encouraging at-home testing, that could become a huge missed opportunity. The agency has also authorized two at-home, over-the-counter PCR tests, from Lucira and Cue, which are more than 90% accurate in replicating results from lab-based PCR tests—and ready in 20- to 30 minutes, rather than a day or so. Eventually, people may use the cheaper antigen tests, which run $20 to $30, on a more regular basis, and if they test positive, spring for the $50-plus at-home PCR tests to confirm the result.

As more people take advantage of self-testing, it’s now up to the CDC to take advantage of new funding for COVID-19 surveillance to find ways to tap into and exploit that data as more people engage in social activities and want to reassure themselves that they’re doing so safely. Mina says most of the tests are still not cheap enough to truly reach everyone who would want to use them—but it’s a start. “Self tests are a really, really powerful tool at your disposal if and when we need it,” he says.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Taking Muni to Bike San Francisco’s Iconic Rides

Taking Muni to Bike San Francisco’s Iconic Rides By Kate McCarthy Take your bike on Muni using the racks on the front of buses to access bike rides on the Great Highway, through Golden Gate Park and across the Golden Gate Bridge. Thousands of riders are expected to hop on a bike in May for National Bike Month and Bike to Wherever Day on Friday, May 20 . For people new to bicycling in San Francisco, using Muni buses to avoid our famous hills and reduce overall trip distances is a great way to get to iconic bike rides and scenic parks.   All Muni buses have bike racks on their front that can hold two or three bikes (only folding bicycles are allowed on Muni’s Metro trains and historic streetcars). Using the bike racks on Muni buses to transport your bike is easy! And, if you have questions while you are doing it, you can always ask the operator, who can assist you. Those looking to bicycle in parks, along the Great Highway, through Golden Gate Park or across the Golden Ga...

Residents Overwhelmingly Support Slow Streets

Residents Overwhelmingly Support Slow Streets By Eillie Anzilotti After over a year of Slow Streets providing safe, low-volume corridors for people to walk, bike, play and travel during the pandemic, we’re excited to share our first comprehensive evaluation of the program . The key takeaway? San Franciscans are overwhelmingly in support of Slow Streets. Slow Streets are designed to limit through traffic on certain residential streets and allow them to be used as a shared roadway for people traveling by foot and by bicycle. Since introducing Slow Streets in April 2020 in response to the Mayor’s Emergency Health Order, SFMTA has designated around 30 corridors covering 47 miles of roadway as Slow Streets. The program has evolved from a critical component of San Francisco’s pandemic response and recovery to a potential new avenue to further the city and SFMTA’s goals around climate action and sustainable transportation. As the Slow Streets program has grown, we wanted to make sure we...

Sunday Streets Starts This Weekend

Sunday Streets Starts This Weekend By Enrique Aguilar A full season of Sunday Streets starts this weekend! Check out the upcoming schedule below.   Sunday Streets 2023 is here, featuring three community parties, two signature mile-plus routes and the Third Annual Phoenix Day block party program. The 15th season will kick off on Galvez Avenue and Mendell Street in Bayview on May 21 from 12 p.m. to 5 p.m. Residents and visitors alike will celebrate the neighborhood's vibrant diversity with cultural programming, health resources, local vendors and recreational activities for all ages. It is completely free and open to everyone! Each neighborhood's character makes the experience a distinct adventure. As the streets come alive with music, dance, and community spirit, SFMTA project experts will be on hand with updates and information on various transportation options. In partnership with Livable City and Into The Streets , the SFMTA proudly supports this series of events t...

More Muni Service Coming in August

More Muni Service Coming in August By Julie Kirschbaum The SFMTA is updating and expanding our next big service change targeted for August 14. These adjustments take into account stakeholder feedback and changes in COVID-19 regulations like physical distancing and our ability to switch operators in the field rather than having to return vehicles to their yards first for cleaning. Enhancements to our previously announced plan include expanding evening service and restoring Muni Owl All-nighter service, adding back four more routes and restoring or adjusting segments on several others. Expanded Evening Service As San Francisco reopens, people are traveling later for work, shopping and dining. To help workers and shoppers get around town we plan to expand service hours on 16 key routes. Instead of 5 a.m. to 10 p.m., these routes will operate from 5 a.m. to midnight. Muni’s full late-night Owl network is scheduled to be restored in August, providing service from midnight to 5 a.m....

India, Israel successfully test Medium-Range Surface-to-Air Missile defence system https://ift.tt/3rXNTWt

India and Israel have successfully tested a Medium-Range Surface-to-Air Missile (MRSAM) defence system jointly developed by the two countries in a boost to their combat capabilities aimed at providing ultimate protection from enemy aircraft. The test was conducted last week at an Indian facility and validated all components of the weapons system, a press release by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) on Tuesday said.

New top story from Time: Katie Ledecky Adds Another Gold to Her Medal Haul in Tokyo

https://ift.tt/2UZCA4A Distance is where Katie Ledecky feels at home. There’s no one better at powering through the long (and tedious) races, and Ledecky reaffirmed that with a decisive win in the 800-m freestyle, the event that started her Olympic experience back in 2012. The win capped off Ledecky’s Tokyo Olympics; it was her last individual after racing four freestyle distances—the 200 m, 400 m, 800 m and 1,500 m—and medaling in three events. Days earlier, she made history by winning the first women’s 1,500-m ever raced at an Olympics—and she did it about an hour after swimming the 200-m freestyle. [time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”] In typical Ledecky fashion, she pulled out ahead of the field after the first turn, and never gave up the lead. Rowdy Gaines, Olympic champion and NBC commentator, tells TIME that no one is better than Ledecky at finding “fresh water”—meaning she’s far enough ahead of the pack that she’s not wasting energy battling anyone’s wake or splash. L...

New top story from Time: Germany Has Officially Recognized Colonial-Era Atrocities in Namibia. But For Some, Reconciliation Is a Long Way Off

https://ift.tt/3fVRkaO The German government formally recognized colonial-era atrocities against the Herero and Nama people in modern-day Namibia for the first time, referring to the early 20th century massacres as “genocide” on Friday and pledging to pay a “ gesture to recognize the immense suffering inflicted.” “In light of the historical and moral responsibility of Germany, we will ask Namibia and the descendants of the victims for forgiveness,” said German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas in a statement , adding that the German government will fund projects related to “reconstruction and the development” of Namibia amounting to €1.1 billion ($1.3 billion). The sum will be paid out over 30 years and must primarily benefit the descendants of the Herero and Nama, Agence France-Presse reported . [time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”] Although it’s a significant step for a once colonial power to agree such a deal with a former colony, there’s skepticism among some experts and ob...

New top story from Time: Here’s What to Know About the ROC and Why Russia Can’t Compete At the Tokyo Olympics

https://ift.tt/3f2gPrp Those tuning into the Tokyo Olympics may have noticed that Russian athletes are competing under the flag of the ROC, or Russian Olympic Committee, rather than their native country. That’s because the 335 Russian athletes participating in this year’s Summer Games are considered “neutrals” due to the fact that Russia is currently banned from the Olympics. In 2019, the World Anti-Doping Agency banned Russia from all international sporting competitions, including the Olympics, for four years over a doping scandal. The punishment was cut in half to two years by the Court of Arbitration for Sport following a 2020 appeal and now ends in December 2022. But at this year’s Olympics, Russia still can’t be represented as a country. [time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”] This led to the creation of the ROC, a workaround for Russian athletes who have proven they weren’t connected to the doping scandal to still be able to compete in Tokyo. How does ROC work? While the...

New top story from Time: First U.S. Cardinal Criminally Charged With Sex Assault Against Minor

https://ift.tt/3la25uv (BOSTON) — Former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, who was defrocked after a Vatican investigation confirmed he had sexually molested adults as well as children, has been charged with sexually assaulting a teenage boy during a wedding reception in 1974, court records show. McCarrick is charged with three counts of indecent assault and battery on a person over 14, according to documents filed in the Dedham District Court on Wednesday. He’s the first cardinal in the U.S. to ever be criminally charged with a sexual crime against a minor, according to Mitchell Garabedian, a well-known lawyer for church sexual abuse victims who is representing the man alleging the abuse by McCarrick. [time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”] “It takes an enormous amount of courage for a sexual abuse victim to report having been sexually abused to investigators and proceed through the criminal process,” Garabedian said in an email. “Let the facts be presented, the law applied, and a fai...

Body of journalist found inside car in UP's Kanpur; strangulation suspected https://ift.tt/2JCOxqX

The body of a journalist was found on the backseat of a car in Uttar Pradesh's Kanpur. According to the details, the incident was reported from the Barra police station area of the city. The police official while talking to the media said that "strangulation is suspected". The family of the deceased reported his disappearance on January 1.