Skip to main content

New top story from Time: We’ll Probably Never Eliminate COVID-19 from the U.S. It’s Still Worth Trying

https://ift.tt/3pUsPxU

2021 got off to a grim pandemic start in the U.S. A huge surge in COVID-19 cases followed the holiday season, peaking at around 300,000 new cases on Jan. 8, 2020. More than 20,000 Americans lost their lives to the virus in a single week in January alone and over 146,00 in total have died since the start of the year. But six weeks later, the picture looks more promising. New daily cases have fallen sharply, daily deaths have fallen to levels not seen since Thanksgiving, and the pace of vaccine roll-out is speeding up.

These positive trends mean that we can now begin to ask what the endgame might look like. Would we be happy with an endemic scenario in which disease levels are kept low but SARS-CoV-2 continues to circulate indefinitely, perhaps with the same kinds of seasonal peaks as we see with flu? Or should we aim higher and attempt to eliminate the disease, meaning there would be no new cases of that disease within our borders? A third scenario is eradication—achieving zero new cases worldwide—but this would be an enormous and highly uncertain global undertaking (we’ve only eradicated one human infectious disease, smallpox).

For elimination in the U.S., we’d need to be able to detect all imported cases at the border and place those people in managed isolation until they are no longer infectious. We’d also need a high-performing surveillance system that can test enough Americans every day to be able to quickly detect and extinguish any outbreaks.

To be sure, we have a long and hard road ahead of us to reach either low endemic levels (the flu scenario) or elimination. There are still huge amounts of infection and transmission in the U.S. There are growing concerns that the more transmissible B.1.1.7 variant, which is doubling every 10 days in the U.S., could cause cases to rise again, and we do not yet have a high-performing nationwide test-and-trace surveillance system in place—let alone adequate support for those infected to isolate themselves or for their contacts to quarantine. Nor have we adopted measures at our borders to reliably detect imported cases and isolate them.

But none of this should be cause for fatalism. With a multi-faceted approach we can continue to drive down transmission and daily case numbers. Proven public health measures, such as masking (ideally with high-filtration masks), distancing, and avoidance of poorly ventilated buildings, should be maintained to protect the unvaccinated and break the cycles of transmission. The roll-out of rapid antigen tests, which would be funded in President Biden’s $1.9 trillion stimulus proposal, would help people return to work and school. Stepping up our genomic surveillance will help guide decision makers as known and new variants start spreading.

In parallel, more Americans will get vaccinated, dramatically reducing their chances of severe illness or death. Based on promising early data from Israel, it also looks like some vaccines may reduce transmission. In other words, while a vaccinated person can still test positive for SARS-CoV-2, the vaccine reduces the chances that they’ll spread the virus to others. If this is the case, every person who is vaccinated will contribute to a firebreak that will stop future surges of infection before they happen. To get there, experts believe we need about 70% of the population to have immunity due to either vaccination or past infection, and probably closer to 80% (or even higher) in the case of more transmissible variants.

We will need to continue to monitor the situation closely and be ready to take prompt action where things are not working. For a start, vaccines are still not readily available, particularly to Black Americans, who are being offered shots at much lower rates than white Americans. Even when availability becomes widespread, perhaps by August, a significant proportion of Americans say they do not wish to be vaccinated, for reasons that we need to better understand. We need to listen to their concerns, not dismiss them, because the more people are vaccinated, the better the community as a whole is protected.

This approach will gradually transform our lives such that the restrictions can start to be lifted once we’re out of the woods. But there won’t be a “light switch” moment when suddenly the disease has been halted. A spring or winter surge could yet occur, requiring the return of restrictions. The only way to be sure that won’t happen is elimination.

Elimination is a tall order. But large parts of the world have managed it for other viruses, like polio and measles—although the potential for reintroductions means we must stay alert and keep vaccination levels high, as shown by a recent measles outbreak in California in which fully 76% of those infected had chosen to go unvaccinated. An easier goal to reach would be low-level endemicity, in which SARS-CoV-2 circulates but is less deadly thanks to regularly updated vaccines, vaccine boosters, and new treatments (all of which “de-risk” the virus). In a poll of over 100 infectious-disease researchers, virologists, and immunologists working on the coronavirus, 89% felt that SARS-CoV-2 was likely or very likely to become an endemic virus.

As outcomes, elimination and endemic transmission may be opposites, but thinking that we need to choose one or the other is a mistake that can impede public understanding of how to manage the pandemic. All the tools that have been used to achieve local elimination of SARS-CoV-2 in places like Australia, Taiwan, and New Zealand—such as test and tracing, case isolation, quarantining of exposed people, border management, and aggressive outbreak control—prevent transmission. These tools avoid the agonizing choice between prolonged damaging lockdowns or prolonged and massive strain on healthcare. And we now have effective vaccines to help the elimination effort.

But vaccines alone do not guarantee elimination, much less worldwide eradication. Nevertheless, recent results from the United Kingdom and Israel suggest that vaccination has rapid benefits, including marked reductions in the numbers needing hospitalization.

The benefits of acting like elimination is possible, even if the harsh reality proves otherwise, are illustrated by those countries that took that approach. Countries like Australia or New Zealand will be embarking on their vaccination campaigns having suffered a tiny fraction of what the U.S. has endured. In a growing number of U.S. states, more than one in every five hundred people have died from COVID-19. The equivalent figure for New Zealand is one in a million. Which do you think is the better place from which to be rolling out an effective vaccine?

There is one thing we can say with certainty: whichever endgame the U.S. chooses will involve trade-offs and we should be open about these. For example, countries that are attempting elimination have returned to a near normal life but they must curtail travel (only to and from other eliminating nations) and maintain strict border measures. If the virus is introduced into unvaccinated communities, as seen recently in Auckland, New Zealand, strong interventions may be necessary.

On the other hand, accepting endemicity means we will have to “tolerate” some level of deaths, probably with seasonal peaks. This is how we currently handle seasonal influenza; we work to minimize infections and their consequences when we cannot eliminate them, and society accepts the resulting risks. Risks cannot be reduced to zero or none of us would ever get in a car.

It is time for an open discussion of the U.S. endgame. While experts can provide scientific advice, given the difficult policy choices ahead, a more inclusive and participatory dialogue is needed, through hearings, town halls and citizen panels. Such deliberative democracy may start to bind up the wounds—pandemic and otherwise—of the intensely partisan 2020. Meanwhile, we need to get vaccines into arms and ensure the virus and its variants never again experience such ready access to so much unprotected human real estate.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FOX NEWS: Cincinnati zoo renames sloth habitat after late 1-year-old who loved sloths The sloth habitat at Ohio's Cincinnati Zoo will be named after a toddler who recently passed away.

Cincinnati zoo renames sloth habitat after late 1-year-old who loved sloths The sloth habitat at Ohio's Cincinnati Zoo will be named after a toddler who recently passed away. via FOX NEWS https://ift.tt/3DLAshi

L Taraval Improvement Project Update

L Taraval Improvement Project Update By Sevilla Mann Roundtable at the Community Parklet Shares Project Updates  This past week, the SFMTA hosted a media roundtable discussing updates about the L Taraval Improvement Project at the community parklet located in front of the The Rolling Out Café  on Taraval St.   Segment B construction began in February 2022 and is scheduled to be completed Fall 2024. Sewer and water infrastructure work is currently taking place. Future work includes track work, overhead line work, the construction of new boarding islands and streetscape improvements.    On hand to answer questions and provide updates was District Four Supervisor Gordon Mar, SFMTA Board Director Sharon Lai and Director of Transportation Jefferey Tumlin.   The Roundtable  Supervisor Mar opened the discussion by highlighting the many benefits that the local community will receive with the planned infrastructure upgrades along the corridor. These benefits include:   Replacing sew

Traffic Collisions have Decreased on San Francisco’s Slow Streets

Traffic Collisions have Decreased on San Francisco’s Slow Streets By Julia Malmo   As a whole, Slow Streets are safer than they were before being designated Slow Streets  Streets that are part of the SFMTA’s  Slow Streets Program have become measurably safer since the program began in 2020, with the number of traffic crashes falling by almost half. On average, these corridors have seen a 48% drop in collisions following their designation as Slow Streets, compared with a 14% drop in collisions citywide over the same period. Slow Streets also are more welcoming for people who walk, bike and roll. Fewer than 1,000 vehicles per day use all but four of the current Slow Streets (20th Street, Minnesota Street, Noe Street, and Page Street).  The goal of the program is to create safe, shared streets that are comfortable and enjoyable for people of all ages and abilities, using any mode of transportation. We now can see how it’s doing in a new evaluation report . When the SFMTA Board appr

IPL 2020 | KKR, SRH search for first win to get off the mark https://ift.tt/333a9nc

Having suffered defeats in their opening games, the Kolkata Knight Riders and Sunrisers Hyderabad will lock horns on Saturday at the Sheikh Zayed Stadium in Abu Dhabi. While Kolkata faced a tough 49-run loss to defending champions Mumbai Indians, the Sunrisers suffered a monumental batting collapse against Royal Challengers Bangalore, losing the game by 10 runs.

https://ift.tt/eA8V8J कोरोना सकंट में TV सीरियल की शूटिंग शूरू, मास्क लगाकर पहुंचे स्टार्स- निया, पार्थ से लेकर रश्मि-PICS

कोरोना वायरस के चलते जारी लॉकडाउन में टीवी व फिल्मों की शूटिंग बंद थी। कोरोना के खतरे को देखते हुए तमाम सीरियल की शूटिंग रोक दी गई तो वहीं फिल्मों को रिलीज अटक गई। एंटरटेंमेंट इंडस्ट्री को कोरोना के चलते करोड़ों from टेलीविजन की खबरें | Television News in Hindi | TV Serials Update in Hindi – FilmiBeat Hindi http:/hindi.filmibeat.com/television/tv-shooting-starts-kasauti-zindagi-kay-naagin-nia-sharma-parth-samthaan-rashmi-desai-pics-090604.html?utm_source=/rss/filmibeat-hindi-television-fb.xml&utm_medium=23.11.231.156&utm_campaign=client-rss

Women Pioneers at Muni: Adeline Svendsen and Muni’s First Newsletter

Women Pioneers at Muni: Adeline Svendsen and Muni’s First Newsletter By Jeremy Menzies To close out Women’s History Month, here’s a look back at one woman whose work to bring Muni staff together in the late 1940s created a legacy that lives on to this day. Adeline “Addy” Svendsen was founding editor of Muni’s first internal newsletter, “ Trolley Topics .” Adeline Svendsen sits at her desk in the Geneva Carhouse office building in this 1949 shot. Trolley Topics was a new venture when it started in February 1946. As Svendsen wrote in the first issue it was created, “to bring a little fun, a little news, and a lot of good will to all our fellow employees in the Railway.” Just two years prior in 1944, Muni merged with the Market Street Railway Company, expanding the small municipal operation into the largest transit provider in the city with hundreds of employees, vehicles of every shape and size, and dozens of facilities scattered across town. The newsletter was meant to help unite

FOX NEWS: Decadent double chocolate mint cookies for National Chocolate Day National Chocolate Day on Oct. 28th calls for a serious dose of chocolate.

Decadent double chocolate mint cookies for National Chocolate Day National Chocolate Day on Oct. 28th calls for a serious dose of chocolate. via FOX NEWS https://ift.tt/3nEJxSB

New top story from Time: Summer Tutoring Is Not the Solution to a Lost Year of Schooling. It Might Hurt Kids More Than It Helps Them

https://ift.tt/2Wpnci1 Summer tutoring has become the rallying cry by politicians and pundits as a way to address the learning loss from months of remote and hybrid learning. A frightening number of students did not show up to class last school year, including up to 15% of kindergarteners in some school districts. But tutoring is the not the easy solution many think it is. Before parents sign up their children, they need to do their own homework and, except under specific conditions, they should not pursue tutoring. Simply put, most children do not benefit long term from standard tutoring. Moreover, current trends in supplemental education can end up hurting children. [time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”] Tutoring can work well under certain conditions for children. Unfortunately, those conditions are quite strict. First, tutors should have a strong command of the content and must find ways to connect it to the student’s interests. Second, tutoring is more effective when

New top story from Time: The Ballroom Scene Has Long Offered Radical Freedoms For Black and Brown Queer People. Today, That Matters More Than Ever

https://ift.tt/2O8qsKr Marginalized by prejudice, violence, housing insecurity, and HIV infection rates among other burdens, Black and brown transgender and gender-nonconforming people face particular challenges in establishing secure, nourishing communities—both within LGBTQ spaces and in society at large. One response to these stigmas has been the formation of self-sustaining social networks and cultural groups, such as the ballroom scene, a formidable social movement and creative collective for LGBT people of color. Amid what has been called a new golden age for Black culture and storytelling , a particular “Renaissance” in queer Black art and cultural representation is clear. Ballroom culture is now widely seen and celebrated (and appropriated) in the mainstream—across fashion campaigns, music videos, social media and in TV shows like Pose , Legendary , and RuPaul’s Drag Race . And i n this moment, ballroom and voguing as the body politic has much to teach the world abou

New Dashboards Give a Window into Muni Service Changes

New Dashboards Give a Window into Muni Service Changes By Kate McCarthy An inspector manages Muni service. New dashboards that help inform changes to Muni service are now live at SFMTA.com/MuniData Many factors inform our decisions about Muni service adjustments. These include making sure changes to service support the SFMTA’s values, which are economic vitality, environmental stewardship, trust and equity. We also evaluate travel patterns. You can now explore these patterns using the new Muni data dashboards  (SFMTA.com/MuniData). When looking at possible Muni service changes, the first thing we do is turn to the Muni Service Equity Strategy for guidance. Using the Muni Service Equity Strategy, we prioritize providing Muni service along routes that more often serve people of color, members of low-income households, and/or those who are dependent upon transit service, including people with disabilities and seniors. We also use ridership data to analyze where riders are boardin